Combined divisions - these are NOT official results.June 2006
Match Date: 6/10/2006
PlaceNameUSPSAClassDivisionPFLadyForAgeMatch PtsMatch %Point Series
1Bone, DanTY31488AOpenMajorNoNo 567.3421100.000%
2Hilsenbeck, JimL2664AOpenMajorNoNoSenior492.786286.859%
3Walter, CharlesPenULimitedMajorNoNo 478.548284.349%
4Degracia, JeffA56592UProductionMinorNoNo 461.912081.417%
5Stoudmirer, BillA5223UProductionMinorNoNo 419.757973.987%
6Gnyp, MartinA51958BOpenMajorNoNo 418.260873.723%
7Green, MikeA39211BProductionMinorNoNo 407.908371.898%
8Roupe, TommyA15704BLimitedMajorNoNo 406.498471.650%
9Riggs, MikeA54232BProductionMinorNoNo 394.280569.496%
10Smith, JonA34903MLimited 10MajorNoNo388.467468.471%
11Wells, RayA23656AOpenMajorNoNoSenior388.369168.454%
12Gideons, EdwinTY37518MProductionMinorNoNo 382.551267.429%
13Kaczorowski, JoelA55192ALimitedMajorNoNo376.776066.411%
14Byerly, GaryPenUProductionMinorNoNo 371.949565.560%
15Sanders, DanF25745BOpenMajorNoNoSenior368.633164.975%
16Bogey, DarenA48862CLimitedMajorNoNo 360.226263.494%
17Craig, JackA47202BLimitedMajorNoNo 357.734563.054%
18Henson, RickPenUProductionMinorNoNo 332.816758.662%
19Eckhardt, EricPen56685ULimited 10MajorNoNo 320.762356.538%
20Silva, MarkTY25746ALimitedMajorNoNo 314.426855.421%
21Michel, CraigTY55815ULimited 10MajorNoNo 313.549755.266%
22Tucker, IrbyPenALimited 10MajorNoNo 311.592354.921%
23Webb, LinFY36912CRevolverMajorNoNoSenior311.378254.884%
24Tischler, JohnA52476CLimited 10MajorNoNo 305.248053.803%
25Richberg, BillTY11016CLimited 10MajorNoNoSenior304.259753.629%
26Waisner, RodneyA54614CProductionMinorNoNo 304.146053.609%
27Heyborne, SamA53130CLimitedMajorNoNo 301.855353.205%
28Cibuls, DouglasTY3306BLimitedMajorNoNo 291.877351.446%
29Schmidt, BrianA50666CProductionMinorNoNo290.001951.116%
30Yates, SonnyTY33830CLimited 10MajorNoNo 286.434350.487%
31Thompson, MadisonTY53480CProductionMinorNoNo 279.581849.279%
32Rose, ToddA54745CLimitedMajorNoNo 278.950549.168%
33Eberle, WillPenULimited 10MajorNoNo278.842849.149%
34Pohto, DelTY38924CLimited 10MajorNoNo 270.842547.739%
35McKean, TomPenCLimited 10MajorNoNoSenior270.018747.594%
36Lee, RichardA47563UProductionMinorNoNo 267.170847.092%
37MacElroy, JohnPenDLimited 10MajorNoNo 266.923247.048%
38Owens, VannPenUProductionMinorNoNo 266.075946.899%
39Parks, RobertA54284DLimited 10MajorNoNo239.977242.299%
40Gordon, PatrickPenUProductionMinorNoNo 237.914041.935%
41Dederick, MatthewA47614CProductionMinorNoNo 235.208341.458%
42Buoniconti, FrankPenUProductionMinorNoNo 221.413039.026%
43NG, JEREMYPenUProductionMinorNoNo 219.340538.661%
44Miller, TimPenULimited 10MajorNoNo 217.264838.295%
45Oliveira, AlA41826UProductionMinorNoNo212.200037.402%
46Hanlin, RoryPenUProductionMinorNoNo 183.751332.388%
47Whiteside, JakePenULimited 10MajorNoNo 181.412431.976%
48Hendricks, KhalidaPenUProductionMinorYesNo179.594231.655%
49Mitchell, RussPenULimited 10MajorNoNo 178.125531.396%
50Nguyen, MarciPenDLimitedMajorYesNo 172.185030.349%
51Swanson, AndrewPenDLimited 10MajorNoNo 171.367930.205%
52Knipper, CharliePenUProductionMinorNoNo 170.320430.021%
53Goggins, JustinPenUProductionMinorNoNo 155.856827.471%
54Titus, JustinPenULimited 10MajorNoNo 153.967427.138%
55Sangari, SargisA55328CLimitedMajorNoNo 139.738524.630%
56Meza, GregoryPenUProductionMinorNoNo 134.913123.780%
57Slager, JohnPenUProductionMinorNoNo 106.730218.812%
58Heyl, ChrisPenULimited 10MajorNoNo 100.886617.782%
59Weidhas, PaulPenUProductionMinorNoNo 87.871915.488%
60Knipper, FredPenUProductionMinorNoNoSenior77.986513.746%
61Ratliff, NickPenUOpenMajorNoNo 70.507012.428%
62Miller, ChrisPenULimitedMajorNoNo 54.28169.568%
63Maley, DonaldA52671DLimited 10MajorNoNoSenior47.14108.309%
64Tobias, PaulPenULimited 10MajorNoNo 37.25756.567%
65Proby, JasonPenUOpenMinorNoNo 31.34095.524%
66Miller, MartiPenULimited 10MinorYesNo 11.76232.073%
Number of Competitors:66
Printed:06/11/06 7:14 AMPage 4 of 4
Combined divisions - these are NOT official results. Odd things happen when comparing these Combined results to the By Division results. Sometimes the 'Order of Finsh' changes. Normaly this only occurs when two shooters have very similar scores in the By Division results. This is because a different High Hit factor was set for stages in the Combinded results. This is a normal occurance, but it takes more of a math whiz than me to explain.